« Broken "mailto:" links in Gmail | Main | Challenge-response spam filters »
Subject Line Experiment
In our Subject Line Comparison Study, we found that brief, matter-of-fact subject lines got better open rates than "salesy" ones. To further test our findings, we conducted a little experiment with long-time MailChimp user GourmetStation.com.
They were planning to send this Easter promotion to a list from their customer database (we don't want to reveal too much, but the list was in the thousands---plenty for an experiment). The promotion was for free shipping, which is a pretty strong offer.
We split the list in half, and tested 2 different subject lines to see what open rates they'd get...
Subject Lines we tested, and the resulting open rates:
- "Free Shipping this Easter - Offer Code Inside" (13% open rate)
- "Free Shipping - Happy Easter" (16.6% open rate)
As you can see, the brief subject line was a 28% improvement over the long, salesy one with "offer code inside." They both pretty much say the same thing: "Free shipping this Easter." But the 1st one throws in that "offer code inside" line, which makes the whole thing sound like an ad. And nobody needs another ad in their inbox, do they?
How are your subject lines written? Do they tell what's inside, or do they sell what's inside?
Finally, we want to thank GourmetStation for letting us experiment with their campaign. Mothers Day is coming, and if you're looking for a nice gift, you should try one of their chef-prepared gourmet meals. Over the years, we've ordered almost every single meal on their menu, and they're delicious.
April 24, 2006 in Tips, Tricks, Best Practices | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d5a5053ef00d834ca681253ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Subject Line Experiment:
Comments
Hi,
Has anyone done any research to see whether adding the addressee's first name to the subject line has an effect on open rates? In my experience it does, but others tell me that doing so gives the impression of spam unless the sender knows the addressee personally.
Views?
Thanks
Posted by: D | Nov 29, 2006 2:33:03 PM
Mark Brownlow's blog has something about that:
http://www.email-marketing-reports.com/iland/2006/11/names-in-subject-lines.html
He's got almost anything you can think of in email marketing, so it's worth bookmarking. Good independent source.
Thanks for reading the MailChimp blog!
Posted by: Ben | Dec 1, 2006 10:56:08 PM
Hi- I just wrote up a post on subject line testing too. I agree with your assessment here- and that you can get really specific with testing and determine what is right for your audience. Looks like a great site- I'll enjoy reading it!-Anna
subject test- the Beauty of Subject Line testing at http://www.banane.com/workblog/?p=8
Posted by: Anna | Apr 3, 2007 3:11:11 AM
Great article. BTW, I almost spit coffee on my monitor when I read this line: "Spam filters are kind of dumb and don’t infer real English grammar, last time I checked, so having the words women, dream, and wet in them would rank it very high."
Posted by: Ben | Apr 3, 2007 10:09:36 AM





